I saw an advertising video on Facebook this afternoon for something called the Dash Toaster. Instead of two or four slots abreast, this one has one long opening, long enough to insert two pieces of bread end to end. It also has a see-through glass front so you can watch your toast toast.
What was really more fascinating was the demonstration, not of toasting a piece of bread in the Dash but what they did to it afterwards.
First, butter is spread over the toast. Okay. Then some jam. That's fine.
Oh, wait -- now a few blackberries. Nice touch.
Well, hold on -- a couple strawberries are added now. That'll be great.
No, there's more. Whipped cream on top, a very generous squirt thereof from the Reddi-Wip can. All right, that oughta do it.
Well, wait -- not done yet. A sprinkling of slivered almonds. Nice touch.
Oh -- and here comes a shower of powdered sugar. Done, thanks.
Oops, not so fast -- finally a drizzle of honey.
Seriously?
Sunday, May 14, 2017
Sunday, May 7, 2017
Strike 'em out, throw 'em out, blow 'em out
The Chicago Cubs were being blown out by the Yankees in last night’s game at Wrigley Field. Because of heavy use in recent games, the Cubs’ bull pen was pretty much worn out, so Manager Joe Maddon, a bit of a quirky guy anyway, decided to save their arms and sent catcher Miguel Montero to the mound in the top of the ninth inning.
Montero walked two batters but threw a scoreless inning. The Cubs lost 11 to 6.
It reminded me of a game played on the Fourth of July 1977 in which the Cubs were being creamed by the Montreal Expos.
A Cubs outfielder named Larry Biittner, who had pitched a couple times in the minors, had been lobbying Manager Herman Franks for a chance to pitch. With the score 11 to 2, Franks gave Biittner his opportunity in the eighth inning.
I watched that game on television, and I will always remember it, but not for Biittner's performance as a pitcher. What I remember particularly about it is that while Biittner was on the mound, some imaginative member of the WGN-TV crew put a graphic up on the screen that said:
That’s the only reason I remember that game. I generally like to forget games the Cubs lose 19 to 3.
Montero walked two batters but threw a scoreless inning. The Cubs lost 11 to 6.
It reminded me of a game played on the Fourth of July 1977 in which the Cubs were being creamed by the Montreal Expos.
A Cubs outfielder named Larry Biittner, who had pitched a couple times in the minors, had been lobbying Manager Herman Franks for a chance to pitch. With the score 11 to 2, Franks gave Biittner his opportunity in the eighth inning.
I watched that game on television, and I will always remember it, but not for Biittner's performance as a pitcher. What I remember particularly about it is that while Biittner was on the mound, some imaginative member of the WGN-TV crew put a graphic up on the screen that said:
BIITTNER PIITTCHING
That’s the only reason I remember that game. I generally like to forget games the Cubs lose 19 to 3.
Sunday, April 16, 2017
Aw, go float yourself.
As I unwrapped a bar of Ivory soap, I heard the advertisements of my childhood clearly in my head: "It floats!" and especially, "99 and 44/100 percent pure!"
And I said to myself, “Pure what?” I never really gave it a thought.
Some casual research revealed the answer: it is pure soap. Huh?
That required a little further research as I know diddly about soap making. It seems that soap is made from an alkali (basically lye or potash) and a fat (animal or vegetable). Manufacturers often add substances or chemicals that affect the smell, color, consistency, or generality of it.
Proctor and Gamble did not do that, and to prove it (to whom, nobody seems to know), sometime in the 1890's somebody from P&G sent samples of their white soap to independent laboratories for analysis. One scientist’s report noted that the total sum of the impurities in the soap was 0.56%. Some enterprising P&G executive who could subtract got the bright idea to advertise its purity with the famous appellation, “99 and 44/100% pure.”
As for the floating, that's the result of whipping it full of air. Whether the air is hot or not, it is extremely appropriate for advertising purposes.
And I said to myself, “Pure what?” I never really gave it a thought.
Some casual research revealed the answer: it is pure soap. Huh?
That required a little further research as I know diddly about soap making. It seems that soap is made from an alkali (basically lye or potash) and a fat (animal or vegetable). Manufacturers often add substances or chemicals that affect the smell, color, consistency, or generality of it.
Proctor and Gamble did not do that, and to prove it (to whom, nobody seems to know), sometime in the 1890's somebody from P&G sent samples of their white soap to independent laboratories for analysis. One scientist’s report noted that the total sum of the impurities in the soap was 0.56%. Some enterprising P&G executive who could subtract got the bright idea to advertise its purity with the famous appellation, “99 and 44/100% pure.”
As for the floating, that's the result of whipping it full of air. Whether the air is hot or not, it is extremely appropriate for advertising purposes.
Friday, April 14, 2017
Brain Fuzz
Everybody knows that the mind tends to get a little fuzzy as we grow older. I can still be surprised, however, by the extent of the effects of my own fuzzy brain.
As for instance last evening, when I decided my aperitif would be one of my newer favorites, a Tom Collins.
I put light rum, lime juice and simple syrup in a tall glass, used my tiny battery-powered frother to mix it thoroughly, added ice cubes, then filled the glass with club soda, stirring with a wooden chop stick (more on that some other time).
It was terrible. Well, okay, maybe not terrible, but not good. It basically tasted like carbonated lime. Adding a little more sugar syrup helped, but it was still a disappointment.
I mentally reviewed every step I had taken, and found no fault. In case I had gotten the proportions wrong, I looked up the recipe I always use. It then became perfectly clear that I had used the correct manner and method for a Tom Collins with the ingredients for a Daiquiri.
Maybe old people with fuzzy brains should drink fuzzy navels.
As for instance last evening, when I decided my aperitif would be one of my newer favorites, a Tom Collins.
I put light rum, lime juice and simple syrup in a tall glass, used my tiny battery-powered frother to mix it thoroughly, added ice cubes, then filled the glass with club soda, stirring with a wooden chop stick (more on that some other time).
It was terrible. Well, okay, maybe not terrible, but not good. It basically tasted like carbonated lime. Adding a little more sugar syrup helped, but it was still a disappointment.
I mentally reviewed every step I had taken, and found no fault. In case I had gotten the proportions wrong, I looked up the recipe I always use. It then became perfectly clear that I had used the correct manner and method for a Tom Collins with the ingredients for a Daiquiri.
Maybe old people with fuzzy brains should drink fuzzy navels.
Wednesday, April 12, 2017
Neighboring States
When the U.S. Mint started their State Quarters series in 1999, I started saving them. When the program was over ten years later, I had six complete sets, and I decided that was enough.
Any time one comes my way, I still do save the Illinois quarter, however, it being my favorite. Yes, I live in Michigan, but I’m from Illinois. (See my post on this topic from October 3, 2010.)
A few years ago I happened to be in a coin store and decided I would buy a silver proof Illinois quarter. Proof coins are intended for collectors and are struck with highly polished dies on highly polished blanks and are – well, highly polished, and very shiny and pretty. Some coins, the State Quarters among them, also come in a silver proof variety. Instead of the regular copper and tin alloy of common quarters, these are 90 percent silver, just like our quarters (and dimes and half dollars and dollars) used to be back in the day.
When I got home, I was admiring the coin, but I suddenly realized it was not silver. There was a distinct coppery tinge to the edge of it. I took it back to the store, complained to the guy who sold it to me, and was given a genuine silver Illinois quarter in exchange.
Last week I was in that same coin shop, and I thought it would be fun to get another silver Illinois quarter. The man waiting on me went off to see if he had one. At one point he called out, “What year is the Illinois?” I told him it was 2003, and in a minute he came back with a bright, shiny coin. I studied it very closely, making sure there was no tell-tale copper color on the edge. Finally convinced it was silver, I paid the man and went away happy.
When I got home, I was admiring my new coin -- there was George Washington on one side, and on the other side where Abe Lincoln should be, there was the Gateway Arch.
Yep, it’s genuine silver, all right. But it’s Missouri.
Any time one comes my way, I still do save the Illinois quarter, however, it being my favorite. Yes, I live in Michigan, but I’m from Illinois. (See my post on this topic from October 3, 2010.)
A few years ago I happened to be in a coin store and decided I would buy a silver proof Illinois quarter. Proof coins are intended for collectors and are struck with highly polished dies on highly polished blanks and are – well, highly polished, and very shiny and pretty. Some coins, the State Quarters among them, also come in a silver proof variety. Instead of the regular copper and tin alloy of common quarters, these are 90 percent silver, just like our quarters (and dimes and half dollars and dollars) used to be back in the day.
When I got home, I was admiring the coin, but I suddenly realized it was not silver. There was a distinct coppery tinge to the edge of it. I took it back to the store, complained to the guy who sold it to me, and was given a genuine silver Illinois quarter in exchange.
Last week I was in that same coin shop, and I thought it would be fun to get another silver Illinois quarter. The man waiting on me went off to see if he had one. At one point he called out, “What year is the Illinois?” I told him it was 2003, and in a minute he came back with a bright, shiny coin. I studied it very closely, making sure there was no tell-tale copper color on the edge. Finally convinced it was silver, I paid the man and went away happy.
When I got home, I was admiring my new coin -- there was George Washington on one side, and on the other side where Abe Lincoln should be, there was the Gateway Arch.
Yep, it’s genuine silver, all right. But it’s Missouri.
Monday, March 27, 2017
Un is Un, no?
I am bombarded with enough unwanted emails that I have grown quite adept at scrolling to the bottom of the page and finding the link labelled unsubscribe.
I click on it, and it takes me to an Internet screen that asks me what I want to do. Well, since I clicked on unsubscribe I probably want to unsubscribe, don't I? I, therefore, click on "unsubscribe from all emails" or equivalent, and then a screen comes up and asks me why I don't want to receive these emails anymore.
Sometimes I am to fill in with a word or phrase, and sometimes I am given several choices. My favorite one is, "The content is inappropriate." Almost makes it sound like they're sending me porn, doesn't it?
So, I click on whatever answer I like best at the time, whereupon some sort of message pops up -- sometimes telling me they're sorry to see me go, often telling me how to subscribe again if I should ever change my mind, but usually just assuring me that my effort to unsubscribe was a success.
And within ten minutes they send me an email telling me I won't be getting any more emails from them.
Sheesh.
I click on it, and it takes me to an Internet screen that asks me what I want to do. Well, since I clicked on unsubscribe I probably want to unsubscribe, don't I? I, therefore, click on "unsubscribe from all emails" or equivalent, and then a screen comes up and asks me why I don't want to receive these emails anymore.
Sometimes I am to fill in with a word or phrase, and sometimes I am given several choices. My favorite one is, "The content is inappropriate." Almost makes it sound like they're sending me porn, doesn't it?
So, I click on whatever answer I like best at the time, whereupon some sort of message pops up -- sometimes telling me they're sorry to see me go, often telling me how to subscribe again if I should ever change my mind, but usually just assuring me that my effort to unsubscribe was a success.
And within ten minutes they send me an email telling me I won't be getting any more emails from them.
Sheesh.
Sunday, March 19, 2017
Well, here we go
Toward the end of December, I promised myself that in the new year I would post more often on this here blog thing, aiming at something like three or four times a week at minimum. So far this year, I've published four (count 'em) blog postings, all in January. And here we are halfway through March.
Part of the problem is not having much to say. Occasionally a good topic will occur to me, and five minutes later I've forgotten what it was. I guess I need to carry paper and pencil with me wherever I go.
Another really big problem is the inordinate amount of time I spend folding paper. I love to fold paper. I love it so much, in fact, that I have started a second blog, called Fugitive Origami. (Click here to go there. It will have more content soon.)
I decided a few months ago that anybody with serious origami ambitions needs to be able to fold a decent crane, so I practice making cranes almost every day. My wife liked them so much she told me I could "leave those all over the house" if I wanted to. So far she has not admitted she regrets saying that. I haven't reached 1000 cranes yet, but I plan to get there.
My real passion is folding boxes. I love folding boxes so much that I don't know what to do with all of them. Sometimes I fold a box just because I want to fold a box, and then I throw it away. Right now I am struggling with some of the modular box designs by my idol, Tomoko Fuse, but I have finally mastered a relatively tricky one-piece triangular box of hers. Makes me proud.
So, that's all the excuses I've got for now.
And speaking of ambition, I read a quote this morning that I liked so much I want to share it here. Asked what she wanted to be, a young child wrote, "When I grow up I want to get a hat and put it on."
'Tis the gift to be simple.
Part of the problem is not having much to say. Occasionally a good topic will occur to me, and five minutes later I've forgotten what it was. I guess I need to carry paper and pencil with me wherever I go.
Another really big problem is the inordinate amount of time I spend folding paper. I love to fold paper. I love it so much, in fact, that I have started a second blog, called Fugitive Origami. (Click here to go there. It will have more content soon.)
I decided a few months ago that anybody with serious origami ambitions needs to be able to fold a decent crane, so I practice making cranes almost every day. My wife liked them so much she told me I could "leave those all over the house" if I wanted to. So far she has not admitted she regrets saying that. I haven't reached 1000 cranes yet, but I plan to get there.
My real passion is folding boxes. I love folding boxes so much that I don't know what to do with all of them. Sometimes I fold a box just because I want to fold a box, and then I throw it away. Right now I am struggling with some of the modular box designs by my idol, Tomoko Fuse, but I have finally mastered a relatively tricky one-piece triangular box of hers. Makes me proud.
So, that's all the excuses I've got for now.
And speaking of ambition, I read a quote this morning that I liked so much I want to share it here. Asked what she wanted to be, a young child wrote, "When I grow up I want to get a hat and put it on."
'Tis the gift to be simple.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

